Contemporary culture plays footsie with some of the more potent words in our vocabulary. They become pop buzzwords, language that morphs the concept into something not intended in the etymology of the terms. We love to place our particular twist on things, the mark of our own generation on language.
Take, authenticity, or authentic, for example. This isn't a mysterious term. From a Greek compound, autos, meaning self, and hentes, meaning to do something, the word authentic means genuine or original as if I did it myself. So, to be authentic, or to exhibit authenticity is to be real. It means to be totally genuine, the real you.
Modern wordsmiths added a couple of twists to ratchet up the meaning. So today, authentic has been twisted to mean profane, raw, edgy, street wise, perhaps honest to the point of embarrassment. Authentic people are truly admired because they push the envelop of decency, season their language with over the edge descriptives, perhaps offer some shock therapy to others, a jolt to wake up the people around them. One famous youth leader/speaker/author would drop an expletive into his talks and make the point that some people were more concerned with the one single word spoken than the essential message he was trying to deliver. So, today "shock jocks" rock the house with colorful language, images, thoughts, and all manner of language just for the sake of authenticity.
No biggie. That is, until a reverse application is accepted as the norm too. So, the new formula for authenticity says if you're not profane, not angry, do not push the envelop, are not edgy, and don't drop language bombs in communication you're not authentic. The test of authenticity is then shifted from that which accurately projects who we are personally to that which resonates with the people listening to us. So, authentic communicators today are not people who are necessarily true to themselves. No, the real thing is measured by how much what is said is true of the people listening.
The Bible speaks about the temptation to speak what "itching ears" want to hear. It's what Paul wrote to Timothy, "For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear" (2 Timothy 4:3). It's a pretty vivid illustration, this mention of "itching ears". It pictures a temporary inconvenience, an itch that moves first here then there, according to the circumstances at the time. The warning is clear. Some preachers will aim their words at the multi-faceted audience rather than the audience of one, and will permit their message to reflect the group and not themselves. On a modern score-card this is seen as authentic. In reality, it may just be plain staging, saying things in a way that pushes buttons in the hearers. How cool. How authentic.
Authentic means real to you. So, our speech and actions, the lessons we teach and preach, the way we communicate to the people around us, must reflect what is real to us and not what touches the buttons of our listeners. Being rude and crude may make some people admire your frankness. At the same time, it may just announce a shallowness of faith that hasn't reached to the language part of your life.
Then, it more than an authenticity issue. It may then be a resistance or disobedience issue. So, we should speak what is genuine to our faith, and not jsut what other people like to hear.